Serato DJ Pro General Discussion
Rane 72 Blutooth capable?
Talk about Serato DJ Pro, expansion packs and supported hardware
Rane 72 Blutooth capable?
Ollieboy
3:24 PM - 28 October, 2017
This feature would be amazing! Since alot of the speakers and head phones now a days are made with this feature this means no more cables! And it will be away to help DJs with the new FCC regulation!
Rebelguy
10:33 PM - 28 October, 2017
What FCC regulation?
Quote:
This feature would be amazing! Since alot of the speakers and head phones now a days are made with this feature this means no more cables! And it will be away to help DJs with the new FCC regulation!What FCC regulation?
Ollieboy
8:32 AM - 29 October, 2017
They're putting a ban on use of wireless audio operating in the 600mhz range starting 2018 www.fcc.gov
Rebelguy
1:35 PM - 29 October, 2017
How would that have anything to do with this mixer or headphones?
Quote:
They're putting a ban on use of wireless audio operating in the 600mhz range starting 2018 www.fcc.govHow would that have anything to do with this mixer or headphones?
Matt-C
7:57 PM - 29 October, 2017
Hi guys
Currently Bluetooth has an unacceptable amount of latency that would make connectivity problematic for DJ use.
The 30-40ms of delay would cause havoc in the mix (unless you were hardcore into Sync).
I'd suggest keeping Bluetooth for consumer based use for now, but keep an eye on this space for the future!
Currently Bluetooth has an unacceptable amount of latency that would make connectivity problematic for DJ use.
The 30-40ms of delay would cause havoc in the mix (unless you were hardcore into Sync).
I'd suggest keeping Bluetooth for consumer based use for now, but keep an eye on this space for the future!
AddamXavier
2:54 AM - 30 October, 2017
Currently Bluetooth has an unacceptable amount of latency that would make connectivity problematic for DJ use.
The 30-40ms of delay would cause havoc in the mix (unless you were hardcore into Sync).
I'd suggest keeping Bluetooth for consumer based use for now, but keep an eye on this space for the future!
Another thing Pioneer is trying to change: djworx.com. Not in a mixer, but still pretty interesting and potentially a signal of things to come from them.
Quote:
Hi guysCurrently Bluetooth has an unacceptable amount of latency that would make connectivity problematic for DJ use.
The 30-40ms of delay would cause havoc in the mix (unless you were hardcore into Sync).
I'd suggest keeping Bluetooth for consumer based use for now, but keep an eye on this space for the future!
Another thing Pioneer is trying to change: djworx.com. Not in a mixer, but still pretty interesting and potentially a signal of things to come from them.
Rebelguy
5:37 PM - 30 October, 2017
Currently Bluetooth has an unacceptable amount of latency that would make connectivity problematic for DJ use.
The 30-40ms of delay would cause havoc in the mix (unless you were hardcore into Sync).
I'd suggest keeping Bluetooth for consumer based use for now, but keep an eye on this space for the future!
Another thing Pioneer is trying to change: djworx.com. Not in a mixer, but still pretty interesting and potentially a signal of things to come from them.
The codec they are using only addresses the fidelity of the Audio. It does nothing to address the latency. This is pioneer jumping on the Bluetooth bandwagon. This is somewhat useless. If you are using these for studio monitors it would make more sense to wire them up given the short distance.
Quote:
Quote:
Hi guysCurrently Bluetooth has an unacceptable amount of latency that would make connectivity problematic for DJ use.
The 30-40ms of delay would cause havoc in the mix (unless you were hardcore into Sync).
I'd suggest keeping Bluetooth for consumer based use for now, but keep an eye on this space for the future!
Another thing Pioneer is trying to change: djworx.com. Not in a mixer, but still pretty interesting and potentially a signal of things to come from them.
The codec they are using only addresses the fidelity of the Audio. It does nothing to address the latency. This is pioneer jumping on the Bluetooth bandwagon. This is somewhat useless. If you are using these for studio monitors it would make more sense to wire them up given the short distance.
DJ Art Pumpin Payne
12:28 AM - 31 October, 2017
My 1st thought was for a wedding or mobile DJ - decent sound - no mixing.
Mic the Rev, bride, and groom - cue the ceremony music - ACTION!
Break down or move in a matter of seconds...
Quote:
The codec they are using only addresses the fidelity of the Audio. It does nothing to address the latency. This is pioneer jumping on the Bluetooth bandwagon. This is somewhat useless. If you are using these for studio monitors it would make more sense to wire them up given the short distance.My 1st thought was for a wedding or mobile DJ - decent sound - no mixing.
Mic the Rev, bride, and groom - cue the ceremony music - ACTION!
Break down or move in a matter of seconds...
greggotron
3:51 AM - 2 November, 2017
Currently Bluetooth has an unacceptable amount of latency that would make connectivity problematic for DJ use.
The 30-40ms of delay would cause havoc in the mix (unless you were hardcore into Sync).
I'd suggest keeping Bluetooth for consumer based use for now, but keep an eye on this space for the future!
Have you tried the mixfader? That uses Bluetooth and seems to have no real latency that’s detectable by ear.
Quote:
Hi guysCurrently Bluetooth has an unacceptable amount of latency that would make connectivity problematic for DJ use.
The 30-40ms of delay would cause havoc in the mix (unless you were hardcore into Sync).
I'd suggest keeping Bluetooth for consumer based use for now, but keep an eye on this space for the future!
Have you tried the mixfader? That uses Bluetooth and seems to have no real latency that’s detectable by ear.
To participate in this forum discussion please log in to your Serato account.